Orwell Revisited - Thought Control in the West

The Myth of Free Media, the Reality of Controlled Media

The photo shows the US cruise missile attack on Baghdad that initiated the Desert Storm war in 1993. The remarkable thing it that the US has gone half way around the world and has Baghdad bombed killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and yet the the media consistently portrays the US as the innocent victim of Arab 'terrorists' who hate us for our goodness. It can't get any more absurd. There were two hoaxes prior to the 1993 Desert Storm attack on Iraq, the Kuwait incubator hoax, and the Iraqi troops on the Saudi border hoax. The border hoax was exposed by the independent St. Petersburg (FL) Times with satellite photos showing that there were no troops on the Saudi border, but this story appeared nowhere else. The major media endlessly repeated both hoaxes throughout the war. This is the reality of a controlled media.

The media is also not free and independent, it is 100% biased, and this bias is not hidden or covert, it is explicit, overwhelming, and ever present. At the start of the Desert Storm operation the US, the most powerful nation on earth, launched a massive attack on the defenseless city of Baghdad using cruise missiles. The attack was broadcast live on US television, trumpeted in all the newspapers and hailed by government and media. An Austrailian reporter, Peter Arnett, was stationed in a Baghdad hotel during the attack, and his reports from the scene expressed a degree of sympathy for the victims of the US attack. These reports appeared, momentarily, in the US media and created an immediate outrage. Arnett was denounced by President Bush and in the halls of congress. His reports were stopped. A war is the most extreme example of conflict, and there are two sides to every conflict. A free an independent media would present both sides equally. In the western media one side only is presented, 24/7, and the even the suggestion that there is another side to the conflict is unthinkable. This is a totally controlled media.

Thought control in a free society has been studied by Noam Chomsky, who writes in 'How Propaganda Works in the West':

The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.

And this is exactly the way it is done in the United States. Any viewpoint not acceptable to establishment is completely excluded from the media, from politics, and as much as possible from academia. The Zionists have made questioning any aspect of the holocaust hoax social, professional, political, and academic suicide in the US and western world. Ironically, it is Chomsky who given the most vicious expression of the prohibition on any discussion of the holohoax at all, writing

The Holocaust was the most extreme atrocity in human history, and we lose our humanity if we are even willing to enter the arena of debate with those who seek to deny or underplay Nazi crimes.

By entering into the arena of argument and counterargument, of technical feasibility and tactics, of footnotes and citations, by accepting the presumption of legitimacy of debate on certain issues, one has already lost one’s humanity.

Hate Crime Laws

When control of media, politics, and academia is not sufficient to completely eliminate an idea from public discourse, more aggressive means are OSCE Human Dimension Conference 2009 resorted to. The Jews, acting primarily through B'nai B'rith and the ADL in the US and the UN Organization for Secutiy and Cooperation (OSCE) in Europe, are working to make any criticim of Israel, or questioning of the holocaust hoax, a crime punishible by law. The photo is from an OSCE meeting in Paris on 'The Relationship Between Racist, Xenophobic and Anti-Semitic Propaganda on the Internet and Hate Crimes'. The object of the OSCE's efforts is to pass laws like Ireland's Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act of 1989, which contains the following language:

(1) It shall be an offence for a person—
( a ) to publish or distribute written material,
( b ) to use words, behave or display written material—
(i) in any place other than inside a private residence, or
(ii) inside a private residence so that the words, behaviour or material are heard or seen by persons outside the residence,
or
( c ) to distribute, show or play a recording of visual images or sounds, if the written material, words, behaviour, visual images or sounds, as the case may be, are threatening, abusive or insulting and are intended or, having regard to all the circumstances, are likely to stir up hatred.


In the US the ADL has been somewhat stymied by the First Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech. The ADL has been waging a relentless campaign to circumvent the law for 30 years, and you can read about their efforts here Hate Crimes Laws and here Racits, Bigots and the Law on the Internet.

The only organized resistance to the ADL has come from the religious right, which comes under the purview of the law because preaching the biblical injunctions against homosexuality can, and has been, prosecuted as a hate crime. See Ted Pike's truthtellers.


Thought Criminals - Holocaust Deniers in Jail Now

Vincent Reynouard

The 38-year-old French chemical engineer was sentenced this to one year in prison and fined 10,000 euros (14,600 dollars) for denying the Holocaust. Vincent Vincent REYNOUARD Reynouard was convicted by a criminal court in Salerne, eastern France, for writing a 16-page pamphlet in 2005 entitled "Holocaust? The Hidden Facts."

Address:
N° 33034
75 rue Lomprez
Maison d'arrêt de Valenciennes
BP 80 455 - FRANCE



Wolfgang Frolich

VIENNA (AFP)---A Vienna court sentenced Monday a former extreme-right city councillor to four years in prison for Holocaust denial, adding another Wolfgang Frolich two-and-a-half years of a previous suspended sentence, a report said. It was the third time that Wolfgang Frohlich, 56, had been found guilty on similar charges, following letters to Austrian members of parliament and Pope Benedict XVI denouncing the Holocaust as a "Satanic lie," the APA news agency said. Pleading "absolutely not guilty," according to APA, Frohlich had already served 23 months behind bars since 2003 -- and gasped in court as the other 29 months were added.

Address:
Justizanstalt Wien Josefstadt
Wickenburggasse 18-22
1082 WIEN
AUSTRIA



Gerd Honsik

ThoughtCrime: 04/28/09 Austrian Gerd Honsik sentenced to 5 years. Gerd Honsik was sentenced to five years in prison by a Vienna court that found him guilty of Gerd Honsik "Wiederbetätigung"— "reengaging" in Nazi era beliefs. The crime is punishable by up to 20 years in prison. While living in Spain from the early 1990s to evade a previous Austrian prison sentence, Honsik published several articles disputing that the Nazis killed millions of Jews at Auschwitz and other concentration camps during World War II. Honsik, 67 who wrote the book Acquittal for Hitler? in 1988, defended himself by arguing that he did not deny the existence of all the gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps.

Address:
Justizanstalt Wien Simmering
Bruhlgasse 2
1110 WIEN
AUSTRIA



Sylvia Stolz

German Patriot Defence Lawyer Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half years in prison and disbarred for 5 years. Below Sylvia's comments to the court. She says Sylvia Stolz the Court is perverting and repressing the truth with the cudgel of "Holocaust," making a mockery of justice. Her trial has made clear the criminal absurdity of prosecuting "Holocaust Denial." How can one deny something that never existed? She says these entire proceedings began as a show trial in a kangaroo court and never progressed beyond that point. The main proceedings were projected with smoke and mirrors and the official fairy tale of "Holocaust" was enforced by undisguised force. She observes that the political intent of the Court is the ultimate eradication of the German Nation and its replacement by a mongrelized and deculturated population of mindless consumers.

Address:
JVA München
Schwarzenbergstraße 14
81549 München
GERMANY



Horst Mahler

On February 21, 2009 Mahler was sentenced to six years imprisonment without possibility at reduction or bail, by a Munich court of justice; during the verdict the Horst Mahler judge said that Mahler had proven "not able to be re-educated" and declared that he as a judge should stop the "nationalist rattle" and "nonsense spread" by Horst Mahler.[19] On March 11 a Potsdam Court sentenced 73 year old Horst Mahler to additional five years imprisonment for Holocaust denial and banalization of Nazi war crimes, due to the perceived danger of an escape attempt, the sentence was to be immediately carried out.[20] It is expected that Mahler will appeal the verdicts.

Address:
Anton Saefkow Allee 22
14772 BRANDENBURG/HAVEL
GERMANY



Pedro VARELA

He is in jail near Barcelona, incarcerated since Sunday December 12th (1) 2010 being sentenced for fifteen months. This is the end of a long run: the Catalonia’s court Pedro VARELA was after him since 1996, for publishing, selling and promoting books that the Jewish lobby dislike. At first, he was sued for H denial; but the supreme court of Spain decided in 2007 that this is not punishable in Spain, because “democracy relies on freedom of investigation and scientific knowledge, and history of WWII is a matter of science”. So now he was found guilty of promoting hate, and worse than that: he supposedly approved of the big H! Pedro Varela argues, how can you approve a genocide which you don’t believe it ever happened?

Address:
Mr Pedro Varela Geiss
CP Can Brians 1
Modulo MRO/ Celda 215
Apdo. correos 1000
E-08760 MARTORELL (Barcelona)
(Spain)



Stephen Whittle (“Heretical Two” US Asylum Seeker)

On 24 March 2009, the two appellants addressed the California court themselves before Judge Rose Peters.[11] On 5 April 2009, with reasons reserved, Sheppard and Stephen Whittle Whittle were denied asylum, upon which the former stated that they would not appeal, and they were deported and returned to prison in the United Kingdom on 17 June 2009.[12] On 10 July 2009, Sheppard was sentenced to 4 years and 10 months in prison, and his co-defendant, Whittle, was convicted of five similar offences.

Address:
#A8041AA Everthorpe Prison
Beck Road
Everthorpe Brough
East Yorkshire HU15 1RB
UNITED KINGDOM



Simon Sheppard (“Heretical Two” US asylum seeker)

On 24 March 2009, the two appellants addressed the California court themselves before Judge Rose Peters.[11] On 5 April 2009, with reasons reserved, Sheppard and Simon Sheppard Whittle were denied asylum, upon which the former stated that they would not appeal, and they were deported and returned to prison in the United Kingdom on 17 June 2009.[12] On 10 July 2009, Sheppard was sentenced to 4 years and 10 months in prison, and his co-defendant, Whittle, was convicted of five similar offences.

Address:
#X0106
HMP Wolds Brough
East Yorkshire HU15 2JZ
England



Brendan O'Connell

The Jewish victim of a verbal racial attack that was posted in a video online says a three-year prison term given to the man who called him a "racist, homicidal Brendan O'Connell maniac" outside a Perth supermarket is not enough. Brendan Lee O'Connell, 40, was sentenced in the District Court in Perth yesterday after being found guilty on Friday of six racial hatred charges. Chuckling and smiling as the counts were read out to him, O'Connell appeared unaffected by the sentence handed down by Judge Henry Wisbey.



Georges Theil

Georges Theil – a 67-year-old retired senior executive of a large state corporation and from 1998 to 2004 an elected community politician of the Rhöne-Alpes Regional Georges Theil Council – was sentenced in 2005 in Limoges and in 2006 in Lyon for openly engaging in revisionist activities. The Limoges court case was about a few dozen copies of Theil’s 2002 published autobiography Un cas d’insoumission – Comment on devient révisionniste, written under the pseudopnym Gilbert Dubreuil with a preface by renowned French Revisionist Robert Faurisson. Theil has since published the book in English under his real name as Heresy in 21st Century France: a case of insubmission to the “Holocaust” dogma.

Address:
6 Rue Gallice
F-38100
Grenoble
FRANCE


Thought Criminals - Jailed, Fined, Deported

Ernst Zundel

Revisionist activist, publisher and author Ernst Zündel was convicted of 14 counts of incitement for Holocaust "denial" and sentenced to five years imprisonment in Ernst Zundel Germany. The charges stem from his running a small publishing house, Samisdat Publishers and his alleged running of the popular and embattled revisionist Website, The Zündelsite. Zundel now lives in his family home in the Black Forest and is not allowed to travel.

Address:
Richard Wagner Str. 64
75313 Bad Wildbad
Germany


David Irving

British historian David Irving was sentenced to three years in prison after admitting that he had denied the Holocaust, a crime in Austria. Irving pleaded guilty David Irving during the one-day trial. The court convicted Irving after his guilty plea under the 1992 law which applies to "whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide or other National Socialist crimes against humanity in a print publication, in broadcast, or other media."


Gaston-Armand Amaudruz

On April 10, 2000, a Swiss court sentenced 79-year-old publicist and retired teacher Gaston-Armand Amaudruz to one year in prison for "denying" the existence of Gaston-Armand Amaudruz homicidal gas chambers in World War II German concentration camps. Amaudruz was found guilty of violating Switzerland's five-year-old "anti-racism" law, which makes it a crime to "deny, grossly minimize or seek to justify genocide or other crimes against humanity." He had broken the law, the court ruled, through his distribution of revisionist books, and for two articles in 1995 issues of his newsletter Courrier du Continent. In one of the offending items he had written: "For my part, I maintain my position: I don't believe in the gas chambers. Let the exterminationists provide the proof and I will believe it. But as I've been waiting for this proof for decades, I don't believe I will see it soon."


Jurgen Graf

Jürgen Graf, a true Swiss hero, a multitalented intellectual. A Swiss school teacher and language genius. Graf speaks seventeen languages fluently, among them the Jurgen Graf most exotic ones such as Russian, Chinese. He is also one of the most succesful authors of revisionism. His most popular book "The Holocaust Under The Scanner" has been translated into Russian, Bulgarian, Italian, Romanian, Danish, English, French, Spanish and Swedish. He has been charged, tried and convicted in Switzerland. He has been dismissed for the second time from his teaching post. He went recently to Russia where he researched Russian archives for months. The Swiss government, under pressure, charged, tried and convicted Graf in September 1998 to 15 months in jail under the new anti-racist law. His German-born, 80-year-old wheel chair-bound publisher, Gerhard Förster, was likewise dragged into court and convicted to 1 year in prison. Four weeks after the sentence was pronounced, Mr. Förster died.


Gunter Deckert

04/21/95 German Court Jails Deckert for Two Years. A Karlsruhe court under Judge Eva-Marie Wollentin on April 21 sentenced Guenter Deckert, former school teacher and Gunter Deckert chairman of the right-wing National Party of Germany (NPD), to two years jail for interpreting at the meeting at which American execution-technology consultant Frederic A. Leuchter spoke in Weinheim in November 1991. Deckert was charged with racial incitement -- the 1990's equivalent of Wehrkraftzersetzung.


Frederik Toben

08/13/09 Fredrick Töben jailed in Australia. Revisionist and free speech activist Dr. Fredrick Töben has been taken into custody to serve a three-month jail term for Frederik Toben violating Australia’s anti-free speech laws. Australian Federal Police took Töben, the author of Where Truth is no Defence, I want to break free, from the Federal Court in Adelaide after losing his appeal against his conviction for contempt of court. Töben refused to be silenced in his struggle to correct the historical record of the Holocaust on the Adelaide Institute website.


Eric Hunt

Hunt was arrested after attempting to interview Elie Wiesel. A jury last month found Hunt guilty of one felony charge of false imprisonment with a hate crime Eric Hunt allegation. He also was convicted of two misdemeanor counts, one for battery and one for elder abuse. He was sentenced to two years in prison.


Germar Rudolf

Rudolf is a German Holocaust denier and chemist whose publication of “revisionist” literature in the form of the Rudolf Report led to his prosecution in 1995. In Germar Rudolf response Rudolf fled Germany to the United States, where he applied for asylum. He was turned down in 2006 and deported to Germany, where he was imprisoned.

Public Email, further dissemination permitted

Germar Rudolf, somewhere in Mexico, Feb. 21, 2011

Dear friends, dear supporters:

Ever since I left England end of August last year, I've basically kept radio silence, for which I ask for understanding and forgiveness. I owe you my gratitude for your continued moral and in a few cases also generous financial support, which are very important to me.

Please permit me to tell you about my late odyssey, which might make it understandable why contact has been severed for the past six months.

On August 31 I traveled to Latin America hoping that my application for permanent legal residence in the US ("greencard"), which I had filed in late 2009, would soon be adjudicated positively, so that I could join my wife and daughter in the U.S.

As a reminder: When I was arrested and deported from the U.S. in November 2005, I was banned to return to the U.S. for five years. My motion to have this ban lifted early, which I had filed in the summer of 2009, has not been decided to this day. Although my application for a "greencard" was processed by the U.S. Consulate in Frankfurt, Germany, in April 2010, it was not finally adjudicated due to the still pending ban. I was told to get in touch with the consulate after the ban had either been lifted or expired. Since the ban expired in mid November 2010, I traveled to northwest Mexico in expectation of a decision.

On getting in touch, the consulate informed us on Nov. 15, 2010, that they would need five workdays to finally adjudicate my application, after which they would get in touch.

Since we still hadn't heard anything after eight workdays, we inquired again. In early Decem-ber 2010 we were told that there had been a delay due to a change of staff. They apologized and promised to wrap up the case within the next 14 days at the latest.

After two more weeks we again had heard nothing from the consulate. Repeated inquires remained unanswered. As a result, Christmas for the Rudolf family fell through. I spent it separated from my family in Mexico…

End of December 2010 the consulate finally got back to us and apologized once more for the long delay, yet explained this time that the case was so complicated that they could not even give an estimate as to how long it will take to adjudicate it. A formal inquiry filed shortly afterwards about the state of affairs revealed in early February that my application is no longer dealt with by the consulate in Frankfurt, but that it is now in Washington, where it is subjected to lengthy security screenings.

Considering that I have been an open book to the U.S. authorities ever since my asylum case was initiated in 2000, nothing justifies this lengthy "security screening." After careful consideration and intensive consultation we therefore decided to go back to court. On January 31, 2011, we filed a "Writ of Mandamus" against the U.S. government, asking a Federal Court to force the government to render a decision. The government has 60 days to respond to this suit, after which the court will either dismiss the case in lack of jurisdiction or will decide it rather quickly (assuming that water doesn't flow uphill…). By the end of April/early May we hope to know more about our future. However, all the court can do is force the U.S. government to decide somehow. In case this happens, we now expect them to turn down my application for some bogus reason.

Since my Mexican tourist visa waiver will expire end of February, I have to leave the country. I will temporarily live with friends in Central America. Should there be no silver lining at the horizon by the end of April/early May, I will return to Europe. Since I am prohibited to be a spouse to my wife and a father to my daughter, I will at least be a father to the children from my first marriage by temporarily returning to Germany.

Meanwhile my wife prepares herself morally to leave the U.S. permanently this coming summer. She can no longer bear the stress of a career, of raising our daughter as a single mother and of running a household without any support. We will probably settle permanently in England, provided that my wife obtains a permission to immigrate. For this I have to prove according to British law that I am capable of supporting my family – which I cannot do currently, as I am formally seen homeless and jobless.

Marital and family bliss are apparently meant only for rich people in England… I've been out of prison for more than one and a half year now , but I am still separated from wife and child, with no end in sight. It feels like I am still a prisoner. (Not to mention that my lawyer bill for January alone amounted to 7,701 US dollars straight.)

You can imagine how I feel

Since I will probably be traveling during the next three months, email is the only realistic way of contacting me.

If you want to support my family and me financially, you can find details below about how this can be done.

With kind regards

Germar Rudolf


Sigfried Verbeke

Verbeke is a leading Belgian Holocaust denier and far-right activist whose statements about the Holocaust have led to his imprisonment on a number of occasions. Sigfried Verbeke


Roeland Raes

Roeland Raes stepped down as senator and party vice president after accusations of Nazi sympathies.[3] He was charged with Holocaust denial in accordance with the Roeland Raes Belgian Holocaust denial law after saying on Dutch television : "I doubt the systematism of the extermination of the Jews and I also doubt the number of deaths, [...] and also whether camps such as Auschwitz were all meant to be extermination camps"[4] During the interview, Raes however had no doubts about the systematic persecution and deportation of Jews by the nazis. The original complaint goes back to 2001. Meanwhile the mother video tape with the full interview, which could have shed light on the context, got lost, so the evidence that can be used in the trial is limited to the parts of the interview that have been broadcast. Early 2006, at the Public Prosecutor’s request and after a hearing in chambers, the charges were dropped, but after an appeal by the Forum of Jewish Organisations, the case was resumed. In December 2008, he was given a suspended sentence of 4 months imprisonment. The Forum of Jewish Organisations and the Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism received 1,000 EUR damages.[5]


Robert Faurisson

Considered by many to be the high priest of French Holocaust denial, Faurisson is a former professor of French literature at the University of Lyon. His speech in Robert Faurisson defence of Nick Griffin, now leader of the British National Party, in 1998 at Harrow Crown Court did little to persuade the jury who found Griffin guilty of inciting racial hatred. He has been convicted for Holocaust denial on numerous occasions.


Manfred Roeder

12/02/99 Manfred Roeder Sentenced for Holocaust Comment. An outspoken German Nationalist was sentenced Thursday to two years in prison without parole for "denying" Roeder the Holocaust. Manfred Roeder, 70, was sentenced for having referred to the Holocaust as "humbug" during an August 1998 election rally in the eastern German city of Stralsund.


Adam Gmurczyk

08/19/97 Polish Editor Faces 23 Years for Publishing 66 Questions. Warsaw City Procurator filed felony charges against Adam Gmurczyk, the editor of a Polish socio-Adam Gmurczyk political monthly, Szczerbiec (shcherbyetz), because it published a translation of the pamphlet, 66 Questions and Answers on the Holocaust. This pamphlet was first published in the early-1980s by the Institute for Historical Review of Newport Beach, CA, and since 1994 is available on the Internet.


Gabriel Andres

03/24/97 Revisionist Editor fined in France. A French court fined a magazine editor $5,200 for publishing revisionist articles. Gabriel Andres, editor of Rot un Wiss Gabriel Andres (Red and White) questioned the existence of "gas chambers" at Struthof-Natzweiler, a concentration camp in Alsace.


Hans-Christian Wendt

02/10/97 Germans Imprison Revisionist Journalist. A German court has sentenced Hans-Christian Wendt, a 25 year-old journalist to one year in jail for spreading "neo-Nazi propaganda." The court found Wendt, a member of the ``Die Nationalen'' group, guilty of inciting racial hatred. In its judgment, the court used typical rhetoric branding Wendt ``one of the leading figures in the extremist scene'' in the Berlin area. To gather evidence against Wendt, the German Thought Police raided his home in August of 1996. The raid of Wendt's personal belongings is said to have resulted in the discovery of Holocaust Revisionist material. Many such books and pamphlets are banned in Germany today. German court findings similar to those of the Wendt case have been used in recent years to eliminate any political dissent in Germany. Today it is estimated that there are over 2,000 political prisoners in Germany.


Eric Delacroix

10/22/96 Lawyer Convicted for Revisionism in France. Eric Delacroix, a 52 year old defense lawyer, was convicted in Paris on October 22, 1996 for "contesting crimes against humanity." For publishing his book, La police de la pensee contre le revisionisme (The Thought Police Against Revisionism), Delacroix was fined 20,000F, 1,500F to each of the 5 associations for their attorney fees and 600F for lawsuit fees; no damages, except the symbolic Franc for each association. Total: 28,305F (5,300 US $).


Manfred Junger

12/02/96 Lutheran Minister Sentenced to Six Months for Revisionism. A lower court in Heilbronn, Germany, has sentenced Manfred Junger, 58 years old, to six months imprisonment without probation for distributing pamphlets which challenge the official history of the "Holocaust." The pamphlets cast doubt on the claims regarding "gas chambers" at Auschwitz.


Thies Christophersen

Christophersen, who was briefly a member of Germany's far-right NPD party and also the CDU party,[2] forged close contacts, both domestically and internationally, Thies Christophersen with other proponents of the "Auschwitz lie" such as Stäglich, Roeder, Udo Walendy, Robert Faurisson and Florentine Rost van Tonningen, and with Stille Hilfe[8] ("Silent Help"), an organisation assisting neo-Nazi activists. Christophersen appeared as a witness in the trial of Ernst Zündel in Canada. He was sentenced to prison several times for a number of crimes, including incitement to racial hatred.


Edwin Neuwirth

11/22/95 Man Convicted for Denying Knowledge of Gas Chambers. In a seemingly politically motivated move, the Government of Austria convicted Edwin Neuwirth for claiming to have no knowledge of Nazi gas chambers. Mr. Neuwirth, was a respected industrialist and former Waffen SS soldier. He won notoriety recently when he invited Russian nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky to Austria. Mr. Neuwirth, who is 68 years of age, was convicted by an eight-member jury, in a seven to one vote, under a law banning statements or actions that deny Nazi atrocities or glorify Nazi activities. Neuwirth was given a one-year suspended sentence.


Bela Ewald Althans

08/29/95 A Berlin court sentenced Bela Ewald Althans to 3 1/2 years in jail for denying that six million Jews were killed by the Third Reich. The court said Althans, Bela Ewald Althans who is only 29 years old, had spread racial hatred and denigrated the state by telling tourists at Auschwitz that the Holocaust was a myth. Althans confrontation with the Auschwitz tourists was a key scene in a 1993 film documentary about Althans entitled, "Profession: Neo-Nazi.'' The film, meant to be a critical look at the neo-Nazi scene, shows Althans telling the concentration camp visitors, ``What is happening here is a giant farce.''


Hans Schmidt

08/08/95 German-American Jailed for Writing Letter. On August 8th, the thought-police arrested a German-American human rights activist for thoughtcrime. Hans Schmidt Hans Schmidt was arrested at the Frankfurt/Main airport enroute to his home in Florida. Schmidt's crime - having written something in his newsletter, USA-Bericht / GANPAC Brief, which offended certain individuals. Hans Schmidt mailed an open letter to a German government official last November. Schmidt's essay was devoted to advocacy of non-violence in the present and future political life of Germany. The offending passage was, "...My God, what do you people imagine? It was the Left, the anarchists, the Jew-and-Freemason-infested political system, along with the controlled press, which have for decades hunted down all Nationals: brutally, intolerantly, unrelentingly and hatefully."


Fred Leuchter

10/28/93 Fred A. Leuchter, Jr., the American execution hardware specialist who insists that claims of wartime mass gassings at Auschwitz are not true, was arrested in Fred Leuchter Cologne, Germany, on October 28, half an hour before his scheduled appearance on a television show. Leuchter was arrested without an arrest warrant or formal charges. He was then taken to Mannheim, leaving his wife, Carolyn, behind in Cologne. Neither speaks German. Only the next day was Leuchter formally charged. Cited in the criminal charge were statements he had made during a speech at a meeting in Germany in November 1991, in which he spoke about his 1988 on-site forensic examination of the alleged execution gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. These facilities were not used, and could not have been used, to kill people as alleged, said Leuchter.


Otto-Ernst Remer

10/22/92 German General Sentenced to Imprisonment. A German court has sentenced Otto-Ernst Remer, an 80-year-old retired army general, to 22 months imprisonment for Otto-Ernst Remer publishing articles disputing wartime mass killings at Auschwitz in gas chambers.


Remi Pontier

On April 10, the appeals court in Caen (Normandy) upheld convictions against Vincent Reynouard, a 23-year-old chemical engineer, and Remi Pontier, an information engineer, for distributing leaflets and stickers that question the existence of extermination gas chambers in Third Reich concentration camps.


Bishop Richard Williamson

BERLIN — A German court convicted ultraconservative British Bishop Richard Williamson on Friday of denying the Holocaust in a television interview. A court in the Bishop Richard Williamson Bavarian city of Regensburg found Williamson guilty of incitement for saying in a 2008 interview with Swedish television that he did not believe Jews were killed in gas chambers during World War II. The court ordered Williamson to pay a fine of euro10,000 ($13,544). The Roman Catholic bishop was barred by his order from attending Friday's proceedings or making statements to the media.


Dirk Zimmermann

Dirk Zimmerman is another young German man who has turned himself in for "Holocaust Denial" in Germany. I wish we had 10,000 Dirk Zimmermans - it would bring the lying Dirk Zimmerman system crashing down! He was brutally sentenced for 9 months in the Zionist-controlled so-called "Bundesrepublik"


Roger Garaudy

A Paris court ordered French philosopher Roger Garaudy to pay 240,000 francs ($40,000) for challenging the existence of homicidal gas chambers in his book, The Roger Garaudy Founding Myths of Israeli Politics. Garaudy, an 84-year-old convert to Islam, was found guilty of breaking a 1990 law that makes it illegal to question World War Two crimes against humanity as defined at the Nuremberg trial. He was also found guilty of "racial defamation", but was cleared of the charge of "provoking race hatred".


Ursula Haverbeck

Despite being 81 years old, Haverbeck, the former president of a recently banned far-right group, Collegium Humanum, was given a six-month suspended prison sentence Ursula Haverbeck and fined €1,000 in Munich for distributing Holocaust denial material in schools. Haverbeck’s husband was Werner Georg Haverbeck, a member of the leadership of the NSDAP during the Third Reich.


Rigolf Hennig

A German revisionist and far-right activist, Hennig is close to Ernst Zündel and waited for him outside the prison gates when he was released in March 2010. Hennig was Rigolf Hennig jailed for nine months in 2006.


Konstantinos Plevris

Plevris is a veteran Greek far-right activist whose book, Jews: The Whole Truth, led to his prosecution in 2007 for inciting racial hatred. He was found guilty but the Konstantinos Plevris verdict was overturned on appeal in 2009 to international outcry.


Norman Lowell

A Maltese fascist Lowell describes the Holocaust as a “hoax” and is surprisingly popular in certain British far-right circles. In 2008 he was sentenced to two years’ Norman Lowell imprisonment, suspended for four years, for inciting racial hatred and for insulting the President of Malta.


Dariusz Ratajczak

Ratajczak was dismissed from his position as a history lecturer at the University of Opole, Poland, following the publication of his book Dangerous Topics, which Dariusz Ratajczak claimed that the gas chambers at Auschwitz were used merely to delouse prisoners. Ratajczak recently died of alcohol poisoning, his decomposing body being found in his car.


Ahmed Rami

Born in Morocco, Rami has lived in Sweden since 1973. His public radio programme, Radio Islam, served as a vehicle for his views and led to his imprisonment in 1990, Ahmed Rami which failed to deter him. He has lectured the Swedish nazi National Socialist Front, which distributes his books.


Ditlieb Felderer

Felderer is a Swedish Holocaust denier and author of Anne Frank’s Diary – A Hoax, which was one of the first books published by the Institute for Historical Review Ditlieb Felderer founded by Willis Carto, the veteran US antisemite. He has been imprisoned on several occasions for his views.


Bernhard Schaub

A Swiss schoolteacher, Schaub was fired after publishing his views on the Holocaust in his book Alder and Rose (1992). He has spoken at NPD events in Germany and is a Bernhard Schaub leading light in the Organisation for the rehabilitation of people persecuted for denying the Holocaust.

Free Web Hosting